Procedures for
Police Vetting.
i.
the
person has validated the information contained in the vet; or
ii.
the person has been given a reasonable
opportunity to validate the information, but has failed to do so within a
reasonable period.
3.
The result of a police vet may
raise employment issues and it is up to the board, as the employer, to decide
if the information gained indicates that they must act. Care must be taken that
a fair process is followed if the board is considering any action.
4.
If the vet does not reveal any
criminal offences or concerns by the police, then the vet will be handed to the
employee or contractor. A record of the
vet having taken place must be kept.
5.
If the vet reveals criminal
offences or concerns by the police then consideration needs to be given as to
whether the information should affect employment at or access to the school.
Every situation is different and should be discussed with an NZSTA
personnel/industrial relations adviser before any action is taken. Some of the
factors that may be looked at are:
a. How serious was the offence?
b. How long ago was the
offending?
c. Has a sentence been served or
are they still doing PD or community service?
d. Was it a one-off offence or is
there a pattern of offending?
e. What is the employee’s/contractor’s
role in the school? How does the type of offence relate to it?
f.
The
concerns raised by a “Red Stamp”? (a “Red Stamp” indicates police have concerns
about the person working with children)
6. If after
considering the nature of an individual’s criminal record the board decides
that it has no concerns, then the vet will be handed to the
employee/contractor. A record of the vet having taken place must be kept.
7. If a criminal
record does raise issues about the suitability of the person in their role at
the school then consult with an NZSTA personnel/industrial relations adviser on
the correct procedure to follow in each case.